Signal transduction is characterised by state changes in components. In experiments, we measure these variables -
or elemental states - as modifications at specific residues or bonds between pairs of components.
Single components may have many elemental states that, much like switches, can be combined into many specific
configuarations or microstates. Most modelling formalisms use a microstate-based description, leading
both to a combinatorial complexity and an ambiguity in the relationship between experiments (elemental states)
and model (microstates) that get worse the larger the model scope (in terms of elemental states) is.
Furthermore, microstates are moving targets, as they depend on the elemental states the model considers,
meaning that changes to a microstate model tend to have far-reaching consequences.
By describing the network in terms of (combintions of) elemental states, the rxncon language gives the model
the same resolution as empirical data. This both minimises the (unnecessary) complexity and maximises the congruence
between experiment and model. Furthermore, elemental states do not depend on each other, making the rxncon language
highly composable. This makes it much easier to update, extend and merge rxncon models, and greatly facilitates the iterative and
cooperative work that is required to build models at the genome scale.
Read more: Network reconstruction;
the rxncon language